0
0.0
Apr 7, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
people like jeffrey clark. been flooded from the attorney general. a former doj official after the 2020 election. going to overthrow the results. efforts could land clark in legal hot water as he is moments away from being disbarred. politico reports eight disciplinary panel in washington has found that jeffrey clark violated the rules for lawyers in an attempt to aid donald trump's bid to support the 2020 election. the preliminary ruling jump starts the process that could lead to suspension or permanent revoking of clark's license to practice law. paul manafort is a convicted felon eventually pardoned by donald trump, now rumored to be in the running to be campaign advisor. an architect of the heinous policy and insurrection enthusiasts. he has plans to focus on quote antiwhite racism and would likely play a key role in a second trump white house. the guardian takes another look at a potential front-runner for something big. rick grinnell currently running a shadow foreign-policy campaign alarming experts. served as a rambunctious ambassador to germ
people like jeffrey clark. been flooded from the attorney general. a former doj official after the 2020 election. going to overthrow the results. efforts could land clark in legal hot water as he is moments away from being disbarred. politico reports eight disciplinary panel in washington has found that jeffrey clark violated the rules for lawyers in an attempt to aid donald trump's bid to support the 2020 election. the preliminary ruling jump starts the process that could lead to suspension or...
0
0.0
Apr 27, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> it's trump's effort to install jeffrey clark is the acting attorney general of the united states. and the point for why he wanted to do that was not just picking who he thought should be running the justice department after you left, it was jeffrey clark was going to use the power of the federal government to pressure georgia lawmakers to overturn their legitimate results. i mean, is that an official act of the president of the united states? >> well, that's going to be in that gray zone they're going to have to sort out and that's why i feel it's going to have to go back to the district court was this was this the president's seeing that the laws were faithfully executed? or was this a candidate trying to bully and press a state into changing its vote when he knew that the vote had been against them. >> well, you write asked to be sorted out. you were there. which one do you believe it is? >> i'm not going to you know, i'd have to see you all the evidence and see the case litigated you're won a few people. i mean, you were there upfront and close and personal, was he bullying pe
. >> it's trump's effort to install jeffrey clark is the acting attorney general of the united states. and the point for why he wanted to do that was not just picking who he thought should be running the justice department after you left, it was jeffrey clark was going to use the power of the federal government to pressure georgia lawmakers to overturn their legitimate results. i mean, is that an official act of the president of the united states? >> well, that's going to be in that...
0
0.0
Apr 8, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we saw it in his efforts with jeffrey clark at the department of justice. he wanted them to say that there was an investigation into fraud. all of these are efforts to mislead the public in an election. i'd say the big difference between the allegations in 2016 that are going to go to trial and what we're seeing now is a little bit like what you covered with janet napolitano. it's just the brazenness that now he's openly saying, you know what? there's no shame. i'm not going to fire a paul manafort because of allegations of what he did in ukraine. in fact, i'm going to hire a felon. i'm going to run on pardoning people who have had due process as janet napolitano so rightly put out. he's become, really, much more brazen, but it's become a strategy. >> brazenness is such a good -- speaking of brazenness, he compared himself to nelson mandela in the last 24 hours. he said he was willing to go to jail. he's, of course, attacked judge mershon despite the gag order. how does this impact -- it seems like an obvious question, but how does this impact his case? >>
we saw it in his efforts with jeffrey clark at the department of justice. he wanted them to say that there was an investigation into fraud. all of these are efforts to mislead the public in an election. i'd say the big difference between the allegations in 2016 that are going to go to trial and what we're seeing now is a little bit like what you covered with janet napolitano. it's just the brazenness that now he's openly saying, you know what? there's no shame. i'm not going to fire a paul...
0
0.0
Apr 30, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
by attempting to violate the rules of professional conduct jeffrey clark betrayed those oaths and in doing so his country. lawyers who betray their country must be disbarred. and i know that, the former president himself, former president and republican presidential nominee. i know him being on trial for multiple felonies is an amazing and unprecedented and frankly astonishing skeptical. stick a pin in that idea of astonishing. because the crime he is alleged to have quarterbacked to try to keep him in power despite losing reelection that crime is now a sprawling nationwide scandal that has resulted in dozens of republican officials almost in almost all the swing states being criminally charged and in all of the prominent lawyers involved in that effort either being criminally charged or having their law licenses put at risk or both. and yes, trump himself will be back in court tomorrow and there's stuff to know about that. we're going to get to that tonight. but no matter what happens to him, in his own felony cases, and in his own political trajectory. do not lose sight of what is
by attempting to violate the rules of professional conduct jeffrey clark betrayed those oaths and in doing so his country. lawyers who betray their country must be disbarred. and i know that, the former president himself, former president and republican presidential nominee. i know him being on trial for multiple felonies is an amazing and unprecedented and frankly astonishing skeptical. stick a pin in that idea of astonishing. because the crime he is alleged to have quarterbacked to try to...
0
0.0
Apr 5, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
people like jeffrey clark, who is a potential attorney general, a former trump doj official who attempted to overthrone the results and help keep trump in power and landing clark in legal hot water as he could be momented away from being disbarred. a disciplinary panel in washington has found that jeffy clark has violated ethic rules to try to subvert the 2020 election and it could lead to suspension or even permanent revoking of clark's license to practice law. and then there is paul manafort. he's rumored to be in the running for a campaign adviser. and stephen miller is overseeing plans to focus on anti-white racism. he would likely play a key role in a second trump white house. and there is brand-new reporting in the guardian that takes another look at a potential front-runner for something big. rick grenell is currently running a shadow foreign policy campaign that is alarming experts, quote, grenell who served as an ambassador to germy an the acting director of national intelligence during trump's first term has carve carved a niche as the articulator and chief of noble affairs that
people like jeffrey clark, who is a potential attorney general, a former trump doj official who attempted to overthrone the results and help keep trump in power and landing clark in legal hot water as he could be momented away from being disbarred. a disciplinary panel in washington has found that jeffy clark has violated ethic rules to try to subvert the 2020 election and it could lead to suspension or even permanent revoking of clark's license to practice law. and then there is paul manafort....
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
clark, the corrupt former doj official. it means they'll be indicted at some point in the future. >> they can't indict until some of these people flip on them? >> i think the reason jack smith is waiting in the d.c. case is because he wants to bang out the trump case, resolve it. then he'll go after the unindicted co-conspirators, but just because you're an an unindicted co-conspirator doesn't necessarily mean you'll be indicts, a lot of moving pieces. >> not necessarily, but he's now facing this on top of 88 criminal charges. if you were on donald trump's big legal team, some in new york tomorrow, some in d.c., what are you telling him tonight? >> please don't fire me, but in addition to that, look, this does -- >> why would he? he needs them now more than ever. >> no. but it's a good way to get a delay. >> explain that. >> one thing someone does for a last gasp effort to get a delay is fire their counsel which they're permitted to do and say i've got my new counsel and i need that person to get up to speed. judge merchan
clark, the corrupt former doj official. it means they'll be indicted at some point in the future. >> they can't indict until some of these people flip on them? >> i think the reason jack smith is waiting in the d.c. case is because he wants to bang out the trump case, resolve it. then he'll go after the unindicted co-conspirators, but just because you're an an unindicted co-conspirator doesn't necessarily mean you'll be indicts, a lot of moving pieces. >> not necessarily, but...
0
0.0
Apr 1, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
i love your reaction to john eastman and jeffrey clark facing disbarment. how could that impact your defense in the georgia case? >> it would affect their defense if they were to take the stand, and if they were to testify. anything they would say under oath publicly could be used against them in a later criminal case, which is why you are seeing them, i think, wisely take the fifth and not speak to avoid exactly that problem. >>> turning to trumps gag order in new york, do you expect the judge to close the loophole that made it possible for trump to attack the judges and family members? >> i don't. the terms of the gag order have a carveout, so, they are allowing for criticism of the court, of the judge, as well as of the district attorney. the gag order really tracks the same gag order that was upheld by the dc court of appeals in the january 6th case in dc. so, by carving out those entities, in addition, it also carves that family members of those entities. i think you will see the judge confirmed that family members of the judge, and family members of t
i love your reaction to john eastman and jeffrey clark facing disbarment. how could that impact your defense in the georgia case? >> it would affect their defense if they were to take the stand, and if they were to testify. anything they would say under oath publicly could be used against them in a later criminal case, which is why you are seeing them, i think, wisely take the fifth and not speak to avoid exactly that problem. >>> turning to trumps gag order in new york, do you...
0
0.0
Apr 8, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
we then saw in his efforts with jeffrey clark at the department of justice, he wanted them to say that there was an investigation into fraud. all of these are efforts to mislead the public in an election. i'd say the big difference between the allegations in 2016 that are going to go to trial and what we're seeing now is a little bit like what you covered with janet napolitano, the brazenness that now he's openly saying there's no shame, i'm not going to fire paul manafort because of allegations about what he did in ukraine. i'm going to run on pardoning people who have had due process, as janet toledano put out, so he's become more brazen, but it's the same strategy. >> the brazenness is such, speaking of brazenness, he compared himself to nelson mandela. in the last 24 hours. he said he was willing to go to trail, he's attacked judge merchan despite the gag order, how does this impact? this seems like an obvious question, how does this impact his case? >> nelson mandela is a step down from his earlier comparison to jesus christ. msnbc you can't make it up sometimes. >> legally none o
we then saw in his efforts with jeffrey clark at the department of justice, he wanted them to say that there was an investigation into fraud. all of these are efforts to mislead the public in an election. i'd say the big difference between the allegations in 2016 that are going to go to trial and what we're seeing now is a little bit like what you covered with janet napolitano, the brazenness that now he's openly saying there's no shame, i'm not going to fire paul manafort because of...
0
0.0
Apr 12, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
jeffrey clark he's indicted. he lost his license. sidney powell, she's indicted. agenda ella, she's indicted both pled guilty. rudy giuliani, i mean, it's it's really hard to think of an example of someone who is represented trump and come out of it with their financial situation intact. they're professional reputation intact their exposure to crimes intact. it's a grueling job, it's a tough gig and here we're going to end up with a situation where this guy is going to take the stand against his former client depending on what happens with the case. >> and also the original attorneys who were working on these two cases when they were still investigations and not actual cases. they're all gone from the legal team. john rally, jim, trustee. now, i've corcoran, all those names are not going to be the ones taking this to trial. now, i mean, trump cycle through lawyers. we have seen this over and over and over again. this goes back frankly, many, many years, but certainly at least from when he's from the time when he was president on, he cycled through lawyers during t
jeffrey clark he's indicted. he lost his license. sidney powell, she's indicted. agenda ella, she's indicted both pled guilty. rudy giuliani, i mean, it's it's really hard to think of an example of someone who is represented trump and come out of it with their financial situation intact. they're professional reputation intact their exposure to crimes intact. it's a grueling job, it's a tough gig and here we're going to end up with a situation where this guy is going to take the stand against...
0
0.0
Apr 5, 2024
04/24
by
CNNW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
clark facing possible disbarment. an attorney disciplinary panel ruling. he violated attorney ethics rules when he attempted to interfere with the 2020 election today nebraska is legislature debates a proposal that would award the state's electoral votes through a winner take all system. that measure is supported by former president trump why nebraska currently splits electoral votes between in statewide and congressional district winners, which often hands one electoral college vote to democrats. >> vision of taking kiss to a company lately, different level beyond being just a music band. and we've always thought of ourselves as more than just a music manson, kiss is cashing in the legendary rock band has sold their catalog brand name, and ip, to a swedish company, the api is reporting the deal is estimated to be worth more than $300 million >> all right. now this no labels will not be fielding a third party ticket in november, the group tried to find a unity candidate, someone who would be an alternative to trump an
clark facing possible disbarment. an attorney disciplinary panel ruling. he violated attorney ethics rules when he attempted to interfere with the 2020 election today nebraska is legislature debates a proposal that would award the state's electoral votes through a winner take all system. that measure is supported by former president trump why nebraska currently splits electoral votes between in statewide and congressional district winners, which often hands one electoral college vote to...
0
0.0
Apr 25, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
if trump had his people at the pentagon and more jeffrey clarks at doj, he would have done what they were hypothetically saying he should be immune from. >> yeah. i thought one of the most distressing parts of the argument -- like you said, there's a cadence to it. one of the most distressing parts of the argument was when justice alito kept trying to shut down michael dreeben's discussion of the facts of the case and what donald trump tried to do here. you saw justice alito keep trying to say, i don't want to talk about this case. i want to talk about the hypothetical world. as you point out, there will be a merging of the hypothetical world and the facts of this case if donald trump comes to power again. everyone who said, don't take donald trump literally, they were proven wrong. donald trump should have been taken literally. donald trump tried to overturn a free and fair election through tactics that led to violence and an attempted insurrection at the nation's capitol. if the courts retreat to some ivory tower theoretical approach, then the next time he is going to be more empow
if trump had his people at the pentagon and more jeffrey clarks at doj, he would have done what they were hypothetically saying he should be immune from. >> yeah. i thought one of the most distressing parts of the argument -- like you said, there's a cadence to it. one of the most distressing parts of the argument was when justice alito kept trying to shut down michael dreeben's discussion of the facts of the case and what donald trump tried to do here. you saw justice alito keep trying...
0
0.0
Apr 4, 2024
04/24
by
MSNBCW
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 1
jeffrey clark, just -- just say you've got an investigation, that's enough. facts do not matter for the same reason he is trying to avoid all of these trials and desperately filing motion after motion to delay things. he does not care about -- he doesn't want facts to come out and in terms of who gets charged, it would be totally fine if he said the people on january 6th committee, these are the crimes they've committed, and these are the facts to support it. then you'd be like, okay, but left out of everything he's saying is any discussion about what it means to have a country based on the rule of law which is you need to have a crime, and you need to have facts. the facts and law are something that should still matter to people. and what he is saying is he's telling you now who he is. >> running on it. >> right. >> unbelievable. tim, andrew, thank you so much for starting us off today. we're grateful to you both. >>> for more legal analysis on the story and everything else we've been talking about and everything else going on, scan the qr code on your scree
jeffrey clark, just -- just say you've got an investigation, that's enough. facts do not matter for the same reason he is trying to avoid all of these trials and desperately filing motion after motion to delay things. he does not care about -- he doesn't want facts to come out and in terms of who gets charged, it would be totally fine if he said the people on january 6th committee, these are the crimes they've committed, and these are the facts to support it. then you'd be like, okay, but left...
0
0.0
Apr 4, 2024
04/24
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 0
favorite 0
quote 0
for instance at the department of justice, if you have people willing to go along 100% with what jeffrey clark and other folks were trying to do after the election, if what you have are loyalists to that agenda and that administration's agenda rather than to the united states and rule of law, then you do not have a democracy, what you have is an autocracy, the ability of one person at the top to pull the levers of the government. host: i have to move on to other people but i will say that anybody who wants to see that conversation that patty was referring to from yesterday can do so on our website -- our website, c-span.org. also project 25 online, project25.org. you can read it for yourself. it is over 800 pages long and it is in the public domain. craig in new york. republican. good morning. caller: look, i think you do a fantastic job. i have heard a lot of folks on the show and you are great. but that is not my point. my point is that i do not mind prices going up if i am going over a bridge, i do not mind paying $10 but i want to know where the money goes. there should be a system w
for instance at the department of justice, if you have people willing to go along 100% with what jeffrey clark and other folks were trying to do after the election, if what you have are loyalists to that agenda and that administration's agenda rather than to the united states and rule of law, then you do not have a democracy, what you have is an autocracy, the ability of one person at the top to pull the levers of the government. host: i have to move on to other people but i will say that...